🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy presents a misguided assessment of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" agendas pose an existential threat to European civilization. Yet, this argument rests on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The true danger facing the EU is not cultural but economic and technological lag.

A Glaring Economic Gap Between the US and Europe

The data reveal a sobering picture. From 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by eighty-seven percent, while a mere 13.5% growth for the EU. During this period, European income per person fell from over three-quarters to just half of the American figure. Strikingly, even the poorest US state now has a greater average income than major European economies like Italy and France.

Today, about half of the global top fifty technology firms are US-based, while a mere four are from Europe.

The Innovation Shortfall: The Core Problem

The growing disparity stems from superior efficiency gains in the US, fueled by technological innovation and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is decidedly American. In the last five decades, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over ten billion dollars, versus just 14 in Europe.

This gap raises a pressing question: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and fusion energy, what is the EU positioned? Experts widely agree it is largely a two-horse race between the US and China, with Europe entering at a clear handicap.

Root Causes of Europe's Innovation Gap

Several key reasons explain this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and agile network for funding startups. The EU has yet to establish a genuine unified investment market, a factor that caps the growth potential of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hinder Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under one regulatory framework to access a consumer base of over 330 million. The European Union, despite a bigger population, is divided among 27 different national regimes, creating huge internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Attitudes toward entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, business failure was once viewed with penalties, whereas in the US, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Defense Spending: The United States enjoys a deeply integrated academic-military-industrial complex. The continent's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Hopefulness

Despite these hurdles, one can find causes for optimism. Policymakers are growing more conscious of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Key reports on EU competitiveness and the single market highlight the need for major reforms.

With the right incentives and regulatory reforms, these assets could support far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses considerable advantages: high-quality workforce, top-tier education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a large internal market and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to unleash a new wave of investment and entrepreneurship.

Crucially, even if Europe does not become the leader in developing cutting-edge technologies, it can still dramatically boost productivity by adopting and adapting advancements from elsewhere.

An Inflection Point

The European Union now faces a decisive moment. As the saying goes, economic erosion often happens "gradually and then suddenly". To date, the continent's technological decline has been steady. However, if it fails to take decisive action to tackle its structural weaknesses, today's slow erosion could turn into a rapid and permanent decline in world influence.